Post-injection Gluteal hematoma (intramuscular )

πŸ“„ SonoAcademy

Post-injection
Gluteal Hematoma

Intramuscular gluteal hematoma ultrasound case study

Post-injection Gluteal Hematoma USG
Post-injection Gluteal Hematoma (Intramuscular)
Gluteal Hematoma Ultrasound
CASE–1
Clinical History
Patient presents with painful swelling in the gluteal region following recent intramuscular injection.
Ultrasound Findings
Ultrasound examination of the gluteal region demonstrates a heterogeneous intramuscular collection within the gluteal musculature at the injection site. Internal echogenic clot/debris is seen. No significant internal vascularity is demonstrated on color Doppler imaging. Mild surrounding soft tissue edema may be present. No definite abscess formation is identified.
Impression
Ultrasound features are suggestive of post-injection intramuscular gluteal hematoma.
Key Learning Points
  • Recent intramuscular injection history is an important clue.
  • Hematoma appears as a heterogeneous intramuscular collection.
  • Internal echoes/debris may represent clot material.
  • Color Doppler usually shows no internal vascularity.
  • Peripheral hyperemia may suggest inflammation or secondary infection.
  • Abscess, injection granuloma, seroma, and soft tissue tumor are important differentials.
Recommendation
Clinical correlation is advised. Follow-up ultrasound may be considered if swelling increases, pain persists, fever develops, or secondary infection is suspected.

image gallery

Normal Chest X-Ray PA view

πŸ“„ SCRS

NORMAL
CXR-PA VIEW

Understanding a Healthy Chest X-Ray Appearance

Normal Chest X-Ray L
Normal Chest X-Ray (PA View)
Normal Chest X-Ray
CASE–1
Clinical History
Routine chest radiograph performed for baseline evaluation.
Findings
PA chest radiograph demonstrates normal cardiac size and mediastinal contours. Both lungs are adequately expanded and clear. No focal consolidation, collapse, pleural effusion, or pneumothorax is identified. Hilar structures appear normal. Costophrenic angles are preserved. No acute osseous abnormality is evident on the visualized thorax.
Impression
Normal PA chest radiograph. No active cardiopulmonary abnormality.
Key Learning Points
  • Normal cardiomediastinal silhouette.
  • Clear lung fields.
  • Sharp costophrenic angles.
  • No pleural effusion.
  • No pneumothorax.

X-Ray Case Study

▣ SCRS

X-RAY
Diagnostic Reference

Ultrasound Pathology Guide

🩻 X-RAY

CHEST

πŸ“‚ NORMAL & BASIC VIEWS

πŸ“„ Normal Chest PA View

πŸ“‚ AIR-SPACE / ALVEOLAR DISEASES

1 πŸ“„ Lobar Pneumonia

2 πŸ“„ Bronchopneumonia

3 πŸ“„ Aspiration Pneumonia

4 πŸ“„ Pulmonary Edema – Cardiogenic

5 πŸ“„ Pulmonary Edema – ARDS

6 πŸ“„ Pulmonary Hemorrhage

7 πŸ“„ Right Middle Lobe Pneumonia

8 πŸ“„ Left Lower Lobe Pneumonia

9 πŸ“„ Lingular Consolidation

10 πŸ“„ Posterior Basal Consolidation

πŸ“‚ TUBERCULOSIS & INFECTIVE DISEASES

11 πŸ“„ Primary Pulmonary Tuberculosis

12 πŸ“„ Post-Primary Tuberculosis

13 πŸ“„ Fibro-Cavitary Tuberculosis

14 πŸ“„ Cavitary Pulmonary Tuberculosis

15 πŸ“„ Miliary Tuberculosis

16 πŸ“„ Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis

17 πŸ“„ Healed Pulmonary Tuberculosis

18 πŸ“„ Tuberculoma

19 πŸ“„ Endobronchial Tuberculosis

20 πŸ“„ Tuberculous Pleural Effusion

21 πŸ“„ MDR Tuberculosis

22 πŸ“„ XDR Tuberculosis

23 πŸ“„ Post-Tubercular Fibrosis

24 πŸ“„ Destroyed Tubercular Lung

25 πŸ“„ Tuberculous Bronchiectasis

26 πŸ“„ Disseminated Tuberculosis

27 πŸ“„ Paravertebral Abscess

28 πŸ“„ Apical Fibrotic Tuberculosis

πŸ“‚ AIRWAY & OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASES

29 πŸ“„ COPD with Hyperinflation

30 πŸ“„ Emphysema

31 πŸ“„ Bullous Lung Disease

32 πŸ“„ Bronchiectasis

33 πŸ“„ Endobronchial Obstruction

34 πŸ“„ Acute Bronchitis

35 πŸ“„ Chronic Bronchitis

36 πŸ“„ Asthmatic Bronchitis

37 πŸ“„ Bronchiolitis

38 πŸ“„ Small Airway Disease

39 πŸ“„ Foreign Body Aspiration

πŸ“‚ COLLAPSE / VOLUME LOSS

40 πŸ“„ Lobar Collapse

41 πŸ“„ Segmental Collapse

42 πŸ“„ Complete Lung Collapse

43 πŸ“„ Atelectatic Band

44 πŸ“„ Middle Lobe Atelectasis

πŸ“‚ INTERSTITIAL / CHRONIC LUNG DISEASE

45 πŸ“„ Interstitial Lung Disease

46 πŸ“„ Pulmonary Fibrosis

47 πŸ“„ Honeycomb Lung

48 πŸ“„ Sarcoidosis

49 πŸ“„ Pneumoconiosis

50 πŸ“„ Silicosis

πŸ“‚ CARDIAC & VASCULAR PATHOLOGY

51 πŸ“„ Cardiomegaly

52 πŸ“„ Congestive Cardiac Failure

53 πŸ“„ Pulmonary Venous Hypertension

54 πŸ“„ Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

55 πŸ“„ Pericardial Effusion

56 πŸ“„ Aortic Unfolding

57 πŸ“„ Aortic Aneurysm

58 πŸ“„ Left Atrial Enlargement

59 πŸ“„ Right Atrial Enlargement

πŸ“‚ PLEURAL DISEASES

60 πŸ“„ Pleural Effusion

61 πŸ“„ Massive Pleural Effusion

62 πŸ“„ Loculated Pleural Effusion

63 πŸ“„ Empyema

64 πŸ“„ Pleural Thickening

65 πŸ“„ Pleural Plaque

66 πŸ“„ Pneumothorax

67 πŸ“„ Tension Pneumothorax

68 πŸ“„ Hydropneumothorax

πŸ“‚ MEDIASTINAL / HILAR PATHOLOGY

69 πŸ“„ Mediastinal Widening

70 πŸ“„ Mediastinal Mass

71 πŸ“„ Hilar Lymphadenopathy

72 πŸ“„ Pneumomediastinum

73 πŸ“„ Thymoma

74 πŸ“„ Retrosternal Goiter

75 πŸ“„ Neurogenic Tumor

76 πŸ“„ Hiatal Hernia

πŸ“‚ LUNG MASSES & NEOPLASMS

77 πŸ“„ Solitary Pulmonary Nodule

78 πŸ“„ Bronchogenic Carcinoma

79 πŸ“„ Metastatic Lung Nodules

80 πŸ“„ Pancoast Tumor

πŸ“‚ TRAUMA & CHEST WALL

81 πŸ“„ Rib Fracture

82 πŸ“„ Flail Chest

83 πŸ“„ Pulmonary Contusion

84 πŸ“„ Hemothorax

85 πŸ“„ Surgical Emphysema

86 πŸ“„ Clavicle Fracture

87 πŸ“„ Sternal Fracture

88 πŸ“„ Vertebral Collapse

89 πŸ“„ Chest Wall Mass

πŸ“‚ DIAPHRAGM & SUBDIAPHRAGMATIC

90 πŸ“„ Elevated Hemidiaphragm

91 πŸ“„ Diaphragmatic Eventration

92 πŸ“„ Diaphragmatic Hernia

93 πŸ“„ Free Air Under Diaphragm

94 πŸ“„ Subphrenic Abscess

πŸ“‚ ICU LINES / DEVICES / POSTOPERATIVE

95 πŸ“„ Endotracheal Tube Position

96 πŸ“„ Central Venous Catheter

97 πŸ“„ Intercostal Drainage Tube

98 πŸ“„ Nasogastric Tube Position

99 πŸ“„ Pacemaker / ICD

100 πŸ“„ Surgical Clips

101 πŸ“„ Post-Lobectomy Changes

102 πŸ“„ Postoperative Chest Changes

πŸ“‚ OTHER / NON-SPECIFIC

103 πŸ“„ No Acute Cardiopulmonary Abnormality

104 πŸ“„ Indeterminate Chest Lesion

Focal Fatty Infiltration

Case Study

Focal Fatty Infiltration

Focal Fatty Infiltration is a benign imaging finding characterized by localized deposition of fat within a specific region of the liver while the remaining hepatic parenchyma appears relatively normal. These areas are typically hyperechoic on ultrasound and are commonly located adjacent to the falciform ligament, gallbladder fossa, porta hepatis, or subcapsular regions. Recognition of focal fatty infiltration is important because it may simulate focal hepatic masses; however, it usually demonstrates geographic margins, preserved vascular architecture, and absence of mass effect, helping differentiate it from true hepatic lesions.

Whole Abdomen & Pelvis Sonography


Technique: Examination performed using a convex 3.5–5 MHz transducer. Longitudinal and transverse planes of the abdomen were evaluated. Color Doppler assessment of hepatic and portal vessels was performed. Pelvic and post-void images were obtained. Patient was fasting for 6–8 hours.
Prior studies: No prior imaging available.
Clinical history: Routine sonographic evaluation.


Liver: Liver demonstrates mildly increased echogenicity. Shows multiples focal geographic hyperechoic area is seen within the hepatic parenchyma, without mass effect or distortion of adjacent vascular structures, consistent with focal fatty infiltration. No focal hepatic mass lesion is identified. Intrahepatic biliary radicles are not dilated. Portal vein is normal in caliber with normal hepatopetal flow. Gall Bladder: Gall bladder is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. No calculus, mass, or sludge is seen. Wall thickness is normal. Common Bile Duct (CBD): CBD is normal in course and caliber throughout its visualized length. Pancreas: Pancreas is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Main pancreatic duct is not dilated. No focal mass or calcification is seen. Spleen: Spleen is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Splenic vein appears normal. No focal lesion or calcification is seen. Right Kidney: Right kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is preserved. Pelvicalyceal system is not dilated. No calculus, hydronephrosis, or mass lesion is seen. Left Kidney: Left kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is preserved. Pelvicalyceal system is not dilated. No calculus, hydronephrosis, or mass lesion is seen. Rt. Ureter: Right ureter is visualized in its proximal segment. No evidence of dilatation. No intraluminal calculus is seen. Lt. Ureter: Left ureter is visualized in its proximal segment. No evidence of dilatation. No intraluminal calculus is seen. Urinary Bladder: Urinary bladder is adequately distended. Wall thickness appears normal. No intraluminal mass or debris is seen. Post-void residual urine is insignificant. Prostate: Prostate volume is within normal limits. Echotexture appears homogeneous. Free Fluid: No free fluid is seen in the abdomen or pelvis.

Other Observations: No abdominal lymphadenopathy identified. Visualized bowel loops are unremarkable. Appendix is not visualized; no sonographic evidence of acute appendicitis. Bilateral inguinal regions are unremarkable without hernia or significant lymphadenopathy.


Measurement Summary:

Liver: 142 mm Spleen: 97 mm
RK: 92 mm LK: 90 mm
Prostate: 7.5 mL


Impression: Focal fatty infiltration of the liver. No focal hepatic mass lesion identified. Otherwise unremarkable ultrasound study of the abdomen and pelvis.

Recommendation: Clinical correlation advised.


Limitations / Technical Factors: Ultrasound evaluation may not detect subtle bowel or early parenchymal abnormalities. Correlation with clinical findings is recommended.

• This report and accompanying images are not valid for medico-legal purposes.


Focal Fatty Infiltration – MCQs


1. What is focal fatty infiltration?
A. Localized hepatic calcification
B. Localized deposition of fat within the liver
C. Liver abscess formation
D. Portal vein thrombosis

2. Focal fatty infiltration most commonly occurs in:
A. Completely normal liver
B. Diffuse fatty liver disease
C. Polycystic liver disease
D. Hepatic trauma

3. On ultrasound, focal fatty infiltration usually appears:
A. Hypoechoic
B. Anechoic
C. Hyperechoic relative to normal liver
D. Calcified

4. A common location for focal fatty infiltration is:
A. Adjacent to the falciform ligament
B. Renal cortex
C. Splenic hilum
D. Pancreatic tail

5. Focal fatty infiltration is generally considered:
A. Malignant
B. Infective
C. Benign
D. Traumatic

6. Which structure is commonly associated with focal fatty infiltration?
A. Coronary ligament
B. Falciform ligament
C. Broad ligament
D. Ureter

7. Focal fatty infiltration may mimic:
A. Hepatic mass lesion
B. Renal stone
C. Gallstone
D. Pancreatitis

8. Recognition of focal fatty infiltration helps avoid:
A. Portal hypertension
B. Misdiagnosis of a liver tumor
C. Ascites
D. Splenomegaly

9. Focal fatty infiltration characteristically demonstrates:
A. Significant mass effect
B. Distortion of vessels
C. Preserved vascular architecture
D. Extensive calcification

10. Focal fatty infiltration most commonly affects which organ?
A. Kidney
B. Pancreas
C. Liver
D. Spleen

πŸ“ Focal Fatty Infiltration – Answer Sheet


1. __________

2. __________

3. __________

4. __________

5. __________

6. __________

7. __________

8. __________

9. __________

10. __________


Correct Answers

1. B, 2. B, 3. C, 4. A, 5. C, 6. B, 7. A, 8. B, 9. C, 10. C

Focal Fatty Sparing

Case Study

Focal Fatty Sparing

Focal Fatty Sparing is a benign imaging finding characterized by localized areas of normal liver parenchyma within a diffusely fatty infiltrated liver. These regions appear relatively hypoechoic compared with the surrounding steatotic liver and commonly occur adjacent to the gallbladder fossa, porta hepatis, or falciform ligament. Recognition of focal fatty sparing is important because it may mimic focal hepatic lesions such as tumors or metastases, although it demonstrates normal vascular architecture and lacks mass effect.

Whole Abdomen & Pelvis Sonography


Technique: Examination performed using a convex 3.5–5 MHz transducer. Longitudinal and transverse planes of the abdomen were evaluated. Color Doppler assessment of hepatic and portal vessels was performed. Pelvic and post-void images were obtained. Patient was fasting for 6–8 hours.
Prior studies: No prior imaging available.
Clinical history: Routine sonographic evaluation.


Liver: Liver appears enlarged and demonstrates diffuse increased echogenicity consistent with fatty infiltration. A focal hypoechoic area is seen adjacent to the gallbladder fossa / periportal region, maintaining normal vascular architecture and without mass effect, consistent with focal fatty sparing. No focal hepatic mass lesion is identified. Intrahepatic biliary radicles are not dilated. Portal vein is normal in caliber with normal hepatopetal flow. Gall Bladder: Gall bladder is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. No calculus, mass, or sludge is seen. Wall thickness is normal. Common Bile Duct (CBD): CBD is normal in course and caliber throughout its visualized length. Pancreas: Pancreas is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Main pancreatic duct is not dilated. No focal mass or calcification is seen. Spleen: Spleen is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Splenic vein appears normal. No focal lesion or calcification is seen. Right Kidney: Right kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is preserved. Pelvicalyceal system is not dilated. No calculus, hydronephrosis, or mass lesion is seen. Left Kidney: Left kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is preserved. Pelvicalyceal system is not dilated. No calculus, hydronephrosis, or mass lesion is seen. Rt. Ureter: Right ureter is visualized in its proximal segment. No evidence of dilatation. No intraluminal calculus is seen. Lt. Ureter: Left ureter is visualized in its proximal segment. No evidence of dilatation. No intraluminal calculus is seen. Urinary Bladder: Urinary bladder is adequately distended. Wall thickness appears normal. No intraluminal mass or debris is seen. Post-void residual urine is insignificant. Prostate: Prostate volume is within normal limits. Echotexture appears homogeneous. Free Fluid: No free fluid is seen in the abdomen or pelvis.

Other Observations: No abdominal lymphadenopathy identified. Visualized bowel loops are unremarkable. Appendix is not visualized; no sonographic evidence of acute appendicitis. Bilateral inguinal regions are unremarkable without hernia or significant lymphadenopathy.


Measurement Summary:

Liver: 159 mm Spleen: 102 mm
RK: 98 mm LK: 106 mm
Prostate: 14.5 mL


Impression: Diffuse fatty liver with focal fatty sparing with hepatomegaly.
No focal hepatic mass lesion identified.br Otherwise unremarkable ultrasound study of the abdomen and pelvis.

Recommendation: Clinical correlation advised.


Kindly Note:

• Kindly intimate us regarding any typographical errors and submit the report for correction within 7 days.

Limitations / Technical Factors: Ultrasound evaluation may not detect subtle bowel or early parenchymal abnormalities. Correlation with clinical findings is recommended.

• This report and accompanying images are not valid for medico-legal purposes.

Focal Fatty Sparing MCQ Quiz

Focal Fatty Sparing – Ultrasound Diagnosis and Scanning Technique

1. Focal fatty sparing refers to:
A. Focal liver abscess
B. Area of normal liver within a fatty liver
C. Hepatic cyst
D. Metastatic lesion
2. Focal fatty sparing is most commonly seen in:
A. Normal liver
B. Cirrhotic liver
C. Diffuse hepatic steatosis
D. Polycystic liver disease
3. On ultrasound, focal fatty sparing appears:
A. More hypoechoic than surrounding fatty liver
B. Completely anechoic
C. Markedly calcified
D. Strongly shadowing
4. A common location for focal fatty sparing is:
A. Around the gallbladder fossa
B. Renal cortex
C. Pancreatic tail
D. Splenic hilum
5. Another frequent site is:
A. Urinary bladder
B. Porta hepatis region
C. Adrenal gland
D. Appendix
6. A key feature suggesting focal fatty sparing is:
A. Mass effect on vessels
B. Distortion of liver capsule
C. Normal vessels traversing the area
D. Thick calcified rim
7. Color Doppler typically shows:
A. Chaotic neovascularity
B. No blood flow
C. Normal vascular pattern
D. Arteriovenous malformation
8. Focal fatty sparing may mimic:
A. Hepatic tumor or metastasis
B. Kidney stone
C. Pleural effusion
D. Ovarian cyst
9. The absence of which feature supports focal fatty sparing?
A. Portal veins
B. Mass effect
C. Normal parenchymal architecture
D. Blood flow
10. Correct recognition of focal fatty sparing helps:
A. Avoid unnecessary biopsy or follow-up
B. Diagnose gallstones
C. Confirm cirrhosis
D. Detect ascites
Answer Key:

1-B, 2-C, 3-A, 4-A, 5-B,
6-C, 7-C, 8-A, 9-B, 10-A

Beaver Tail Liver

Case Study

Beaver Tail Liver

Beaver Tail Liver is an uncommon anatomical variant in which the left hepatic lobe extends laterally across the upper abdomen, often partially or completely surrounding the spleen. This elongated configuration may mimic splenic pathology or perisplenic collections on imaging studies. Recognition of this benign morphological variant is important to avoid diagnostic confusion and inadvertent injury during abdominal trauma assessment or surgical procedures.

Whole Abdomen & Pelvis Sonography


Technique: Examination performed using a convex 3.5–5 MHz transducer. Longitudinal and transverse planes of the abdomen were evaluated. Color Doppler assessment of hepatic and portal vessels was performed. Pelvic and post-void images were obtained. Patient was fasting for 6–8 hours.
Prior studies: No prior imaging available.
Clinical history: Routine sonographic evaluation.


Liver: Liver is normal in size and echotexture with elongated lateral extension of the left hepatic lobe wrapping around the spleen, consistent with Beaver Tail Liver (normal anatomical variant). No focal lesion such as mass, cyst, or abscess is seen. Intrahepatic biliary radicles are not dilated. Portal vein is normal in caliber with normal hepatopetal flow.
Gall Bladder: Gall bladder is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. No calculus, mass, or sludge is seen. Wall thickness is normal.
Common Bile Duct (CBD): CBD is normal in course and caliber throughout its visualized length.
Pancreas: Pancreas is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Main pancreatic duct is not dilated. No focal mass or calcification is seen.
Spleen: Spleen is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Splenic vein appears normal. No focal lesion or calcification is seen.
Right Kidney: Right kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is preserved. Pelvicalyceal system is not dilated. No calculus, hydronephrosis, or mass lesion is seen.
Left Kidney: Left kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is preserved. Pelvicalyceal system is not dilated. No calculus, hydronephrosis, or mass lesion is seen.
Rt. Ureter: Right ureter is visualized in its proximal segment. No evidence of dilatation. No intraluminal calculus is seen.
Lt. Ureter: Left ureter is visualized in its proximal segment. No evidence of dilatation. No intraluminal calculus is seen.
Urinary Bladder: Urinary bladder is adequately distended. Wall thickness appears normal. No intraluminal mass or debris is seen. Post-void residual urine is insignificant.
Prostate: Prostate volume is within normal limits. Echotexture appears homogeneous.
Free Fluid: No free fluid is seen in the abdomen or pelvis.

Other Observations: No abdominal lymphadenopathy identified. Visualized bowel loops are unremarkable. Appendix is not visualized; no sonographic evidence of acute appendicitis. Bilateral inguinal regions are unremarkable without hernia or significant lymphadenopathy.



Measurement Summary:

Liver Rt Lobe: 139 mm Liver Lt Lobe: 92 mm Spleen: 109 mm
RK: 114 mm LK: 117 mm
Prostate: 13 mL



Impression: Beaver Tail Liver (elongated left hepatic lobe), a normal anatomical variant. No focal hepatic lesion. Otherwise unremarkable ultrasound study of the abdomen and pelvis.


Recommendation: Clinical correlation advised.




Limitations / Technical Factors: Ultrasound evaluation may not detect subtle bowel or early parenchymal abnormalities. Correlation with clinical findings is recommended.

• This report and accompanying images are not valid for medico-legal purposes.


Beaver Tail Liver MCQ Quiz

Beaver Tail Liver MCQ Quiz

1. Beaver Tail Liver is:
A. A hepatic tumor
B. A congenital cyst
C. An elongated left hepatic lobe extending around the spleen
D. A gallbladder anomaly
2. Beaver Tail Liver primarily involves:
A. Right hepatic lobe
B. Left hepatic lobe
C. Caudate lobe
D. Quadrate lobe
3. On ultrasound, the extended lobe usually demonstrates:
A. Normal liver echotexture
B. Large calcifications
C. Multiple cysts
D. Gas echoes
4. Beaver Tail Liver may be mistaken for:
A. Splenic mass or perisplenic pathology
B. Renal stone
C. Pleural effusion
D. Pancreatic pseudocyst
5. The best ultrasound approach to evaluate this variant is:
A. Pelvic scan only
B. Thyroid scan
C. Left upper quadrant and intercostal scanning
D. Cardiac apical view
6. A key feature confirming Beaver Tail Liver is:
A. Separation from the liver
B. Fluid-filled appearance
C. Continuity with normal liver parenchyma
D. Presence of calcified walls
7. Color Doppler typically demonstrates:
A. Absence of blood flow
B. Normal hepatic and portal vessels within the extension
C. Chaotic neovascularity
D. Splenic infarction
8. During scanning, the transducer should be positioned to assess:
A. The neck region
B. The left upper abdomen near the spleen
C. Only the pelvis
D. Only the gallbladder
9. The clinical importance of recognizing Beaver Tail Liver is to:
A. Diagnose cirrhosis
B. Diagnose hepatitis
C. Avoid misdiagnosis of splenic or abdominal pathology
D. Detect gallstones
10. Beaver Tail Liver is generally considered:
A. Malignant lesion
B. Normal anatomical variant
C. Hepatic abscess
D. Metastatic disease
Answer Key:

1-C, 2-B, 3-A, 4-A, 5-C,
6-C, 7-B, 8-B, 9-C, 10-B

Riedel’s Lobe

Case Study

Riedel’s Lobe

Riedel’s Lobe is a normal anatomical variant characterized by a tongue-like inferior projection of the right hepatic lobe, most commonly extending from segments V and VI. It may mimic hepatomegaly or an abdominal mass on clinical examination but represents a benign morphological variation without pathological significance.

Whole Abdomen & Pelvis Sonography


Technique: Examination performed using a convex 3.5–5 MHz transducer. Longitudinal and transverse planes of the abdomen were evaluated. Color Doppler assessment of hepatic and portal vessels was performed. Pelvic and post-void images were obtained. Patient was fasting for 6–8 hours.
Prior studies: No prior imaging available.
Clinical history: Routine sonographic evaluation.


Liver: Liver is normal in echotexture with a prominent tongue-like inferior projection of the right hepatic lobe consistent with Riedel's lobe (normal anatomical variant). No focal lesion such as mass, cyst, or abscess is seen. Intrahepatic biliary radicles are not dilated. Portal vein is normal in caliber with normal hepatopetal flow.
Gall Bladder: Gall bladder is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. No calculus, mass, or sludge is seen. Wall thickness is normal.
Common Bile Duct (CBD): CBD is normal in course and caliber throughout its visualized length. Pancreas: Pancreas is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Main pancreatic duct is not dilated. No focal mass or calcification is seen.

Spleen: Spleen is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Splenic vein appears normal. No focal lesion or calcification is seen.
Right Kidney: Right kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is preserved. Pelvicalyceal system is not dilated. No calculus, hydronephrosis, or mass lesion is seen.
Left Kidney: Left kidney is normal in size, shape, and echotexture. Corticomedullary differentiation is preserved. Pelvicalyceal system is not dilated. No calculus, hydronephrosis, or mass lesion is seen.
Rt. Ureter: Right ureter is visualized in its proximal segment. No evidence of dilatation. No intraluminal calculus is seen.
Lt. Ureter: Left ureter is visualized in its proximal segment. No evidence of dilatation. No intraluminal calculus is seen.
Urinary Bladder: Urinary bladder is adequately distended. Wall thickness appears normal. No intraluminal mass or debris is seen. Post-void residual urine is insignificant.
Prostate: Prostate volume is within normal limits. Echotexture appears homogeneous.
Free Fluid: No free fluid is seen in the abdomen or pelvis.


Other Observations: No abdominal lymphadenopathy identified. Visualized bowel loops are unremarkable. Appendix is not visualized; no sonographic evidence of acute appendicitis. Bilateral inguinal regions are unremarkable without hernia or significant lymphadenopathy.



Measurement Summary:

Liver: 136 mm Spleen: 95 mm
RK: 106 mm LK: 112 mm
Prostate: 21 mL

Impression: Prominent Riedel's lobe of the liver (normal anatomical variant). No focal hepatic lesion. Otherwise unremarkable ultrasound study of the abdomen and pelvis.

Recommendation: Clinical correlation advised.


Limitations / Technical Factors: Ultrasound evaluation may not detect subtle bowel or early parenchymal abnormalities. Correlation with clinical findings is recommended.

• This report and accompanying images are not valid for medico-legal purposes.


Riedel's Lobe MCQ Quiz

Riedel's Lobe MCQ Quiz

1. Riedel’s lobe is:
A. Liver cyst
B. Hepatic tumor
C. Tongue-like extension of right lobe
D. Gallbladder anomaly
2. Riedel’s lobe most commonly arises from:
A. Right hepatic lobe
B. Left hepatic lobe
C. Caudate lobe
D. Quadrate lobe
3. On ultrasound, Riedel’s lobe usually has:
A. Anechoic appearance
B. Calcification
C. Mixed cystic-solid pattern
D. Normal liver echotexture
4. Riedel’s lobe may be mistaken for:
A. Renal stone
B. Hepatomegaly or abdominal mass
C. Pleural effusion
D. Pancreatitis
5. The best scan plane to demonstrate its inferior extension is:
A. Thyroid transverse
B. Pelvic sagittal
C. Longitudinal/subcostal liver scan
D. Cardiac apical view
6. A key feature confirming Riedel’s lobe is:
A. Separate from liver
B. Fluid-filled structure
C. Calcified margin
D. Continuity with liver parenchyma
7. Color Doppler typically shows:
A. Normal hepatic vessels
B. No blood flow
C. Chaotic neovascularity
D. Portal vein thrombosis
8. During scanning, the transducer should be extended:
A. Toward the neck
B. Inferiorly below right costal margin
C. Only across the spleen
D. To the pelvis only
9. The main importance of recognizing Riedel’s lobe is:
A. Diagnose cirrhosis
B. Diagnose hepatitis
C. Avoid misdiagnosis as a mass
D. Detect ascites
10. In most cases Riedel’s lobe is considered:
A. Malignant lesion
B. Congenital normal variant
C. Abscess
D. Metastatic disease
Answer Key:

1-C, 2-A, 3-D, 4-B, 5-C,
6-D, 7-A, 8-B, 9-C, 10-B

Diagnostic Sonography Ultrasound Case Study

▣ SCRS

SONOGRAPHIC
Diagnostic Reference

Ultrasound Pathology Guide

ULTRASOUND

ABDOMEN

πŸ“‚ Liver

πŸ“„ Fatty Liver

πŸ“„ Hepatomegaly

πŸ“„ Cirrhosis

πŸ“„ Liver Cyst

πŸ“„ Liver Abscess

πŸ“‚ Gallbladder

πŸ“„ Gall Stone

πŸ“„ Cholecystitis

πŸ“„ GB Sludge

πŸ“„ GB Polyp

πŸ“„ CBD Dilatation

πŸ“‚ Kidney

πŸ“„ Renal Stone

πŸ“„ Hydronephrosis

πŸ“„ Renal Cyst

πŸ“„ Medical Renal Disease

πŸ“„ Pyelonephritis

πŸ“‚ Spleen & Pancreas

πŸ“„ Splenomegaly

πŸ“„ Splenic Cyst

πŸ“„ Pancreatitis

πŸ“„ Pancreatic Mass

πŸ“„ Ascites

πŸ“‚ Abdominal wall

πŸ“„ 00

πŸ”– Miscellaneous

πŸ“„ Umbilical-urachal sinus with preperitoneal abscess

LOWER LIMB

πŸ“‚ Buttuk Region

πŸ“„ Post-Injection Gluteal Hematoma (Intramuscular)

πŸ“„ Hepatomegaly

πŸ“„ Cirrhosis

πŸ“„ Liver Cyst

πŸ“„ Liver Abscess

πŸ“‚ 00

πŸ“„ 00

Leiomyosarcoma Back Lump (Dorsal Wall Ultrasound)

SCRS Topic Header
Leiomyosarcoma – Back Lump (Dorsal Wall Ultrasound)
Dorsal wll Ultrasound Case Study Case Study No: R-33


Dorsal Wall Ultrasound


Technique: Real-time ultrasound examination of the dorsal wall was performed using a high-frequency linear transducer (7–12 MHz). Detailed grayscale and Doppler assessment of the posterior soft tissue structures was carried out in longitudinal and transverse planes.
Clinical indication: Progressive dorsal wall swelling / Pain / Suspicion of aggressive soft tissue neoplasm.


Location: Large soft tissue lesion is noted along the right lateral dorsal wall, involving the deep soft tissue and intermuscular plane.

Soft Tissue Mass: An ill-defined heterogeneous predominantly hypoechoic mass is identified measuring approximately 7.2 × 4.5 cm. The lesion demonstrates irregular infiltrative margins with extension into adjacent soft tissue structures. Internal Characteristics: Areas of internal necrosis are noted within the lesion. Marked heterogeneity of internal echotexture is present. Vascularity: Moderate to marked internal vascularity is demonstrated on Doppler imaging. Adjacent Structures: Infiltration into adjacent soft tissue and intermuscular planes is noted. No definite calcification is identified on current sonographic evaluation.


Impression: Features are suspicious for leiomyosarcoma involving the dorsal wall soft tissues.

Recommendation: Urgent MRI is recommended for staging and assessment of local extent. Histopathological confirmation is essential. Oncological referral is advised.


Kindly Note:

Limitations / Technical Factors:
Ultrasound evaluation has limited capability in assessing the complete extent of deep soft tissue tumors and adjacent osseous involvement.
MRI correlation is recommended for comprehensive staging and treatment planning.
• This report is not valid for medico-legal purposes.

Angioleiomyoma Back Lump (Dorsal Wall Ultrasound)

SCRS Topic Header
Angioleiomyoma – Back Lump (Dorsal Wall Ultrasound)
Dorsal wll Ultrasound Case Study Case Study No: R-32

Dorsal Wall Ultrasound


Technique: Real-time ultrasound examination of the dorsal wall was performed using a high-frequency linear transducer (7–12 MHz). Detailed grayscale and Doppler assessment of the superficial soft tissues was carried out in longitudinal and transverse planes.
Clinical indication: Painful dorsal wall swelling / Palpable soft tissue lesion / Vascular soft tissue mass evaluation.


Location: A focal soft tissue lesion is noted along the right lateral dorsal wall within the subcutaneous plane adjacent to vascular structures.

Soft Tissue Lesion: A well-defined hypoechoic solid lesion is identified measuring approximately 2.4 × 1.3 cm. The lesion appears homogeneous with smooth and well-circumscribed margins. Echotexture: Internal echotexture appears uniform without cystic degeneration, calcification, or necrotic component. Vascularity: Prominent internal vascularity is demonstrated on Doppler imaging, suggestive of vascular smooth muscle origin. Adjacent Structures: No surrounding edema, fascial disruption, or infiltration into adjacent soft tissues is identified.


Impression: Features are suggestive of angioleiomyoma in the dorsal wall.

Recommendation: Clinical correlation is advised. Surgical excision may be considered, especially if painful. Histopathological confirmation is recommended.


Kindly Note:

Limitations / Technical Factors:
Ultrasound evaluation may have limitations in complete tissue characterization and assessment of microscopic extension.
Further imaging or histopathological evaluation may be required depending on clinical suspicion.
• This report is not valid for medico-legal purposes.

Post-injection Gluteal hematoma (intramuscular )

πŸ“„ SonoAcademy Post-injection Gluteal Hematoma Intramu...

Popular post