Diffuse uterine adenomyosis

๐Ÿ“„ SCRS

Diffuse uterine adenomyosis

Diffuse uterine adenomyosis ultrasound case study

USG
Diffuse uterine adenomyosis ultrasound case study
CASE–1
Clinical History
A 38-year-old multiparous female presented with progressively worsening dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, menorrhagia, and pelvic heaviness over the past several years. She was referred for pelvic ultrasound to evaluate suspected adenomyosis.
Ultrasound Findings
Ultrasound examination demonstrates a diffusely enlarged globular uterus measuring approximately 11.2 × 6.8 × 7.1 cm. The myometrium is diffusely heterogeneous with coarse echotexture and asymmetric thickening of the posterior myometrial wall. Multiple tiny intramyometrial cysts measuring approximately 2–5 mm are identified. Prominent echogenic subendometrial linear striations extending into the myometrium and fan-shaped posterior acoustic shadowing are noted. The endometrial-myometrial junction (junctional zone) appears indistinct. No discrete leiomyoma is identified. Color Doppler demonstrates diffuse translesional vascularity throughout the affected myometrium. The endometrium measures 8.6 mm and appears regular. Both ovaries are unremarkable. No adnexal mass or free pelvic fluid is identified.
Ultrasound showing diffuse uterine adenomyosis
Transabdominal pelvic ultrasound. Diffuse globular enlargement of the uterus with heterogeneous myometrium, asymmetric posterior myometrial wall thickening, subendometrial echogenic striations, tiny myometrial cysts, and fan-shaped acoustic shadowing, compatible with diffuse uterine adenomyosis.
Report Line
The uterus is diffusely enlarged with a globular configuration, measuring approximately 11.2 × 6.8 × 7.1 cm. The myometrium demonstrates diffuse heterogeneous echotexture with asymmetric posterior wall thickening, multiple tiny intramyometrial cysts, echogenic subendometrial linear striations, fan-shaped posterior acoustic shadowing, and an indistinct endometrial-myometrial junction. The endometrium measures 8.6 mm. Sonographic findings are highly suggestive of diffuse uterine adenomyosis.
Impression
Sonographic features are consistent with diffuse uterine adenomyosis.
Recommendation
Correlation with the patient's clinical symptoms is recommended. Gynecological consultation is advised for treatment planning. MRI pelvis may be considered when the diagnosis is uncertain or for preoperative mapping. Management options include hormonal therapy, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), uterine artery embolization in selected patients, or hysterectomy in women with severe symptoms who have completed childbearing.
Key Learning Points
  • Diffuse adenomyosis results from ectopic endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium, producing diffuse uterine enlargement.
  • The classic ultrasound appearance includes a globular bulky uterus with heterogeneous myometrium.
  • Characteristic findings include asymmetric myometrial wall thickening, tiny myometrial cysts, echogenic linear striations, fan-shaped acoustic shadowing, and an indistinct junctional zone.
  • Color Doppler typically demonstrates diffuse translesional vascularity rather than peripheral vascularity seen with fibroids.
  • The principal differential diagnoses include diffuse leiomyomatosis, multiple fibroids, and focal adenomyoma.
  • MRI is the most accurate imaging modality when ultrasound findings are equivocal or for surgical planning.
  • Diffuse adenomyosis commonly presents with dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility in women of reproductive age.

Uterine scar endometriosis

๐Ÿ“„ SCRS

Uterine scar endometriosis

Uterine scar endometriosis ultrasound case study

USG
Uterine scar endometriosis ultrasound case study
CASE–1
Clinical History
A 33-year-old female with a previous lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) presented with progressive dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and intermittent abnormal uterine bleeding. She was referred for pelvic ultrasound to evaluate a suspected uterine scar lesion.
Ultrasound Findings
Ultrasound examination demonstrates a well-defined heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion involving the anterior lower uterine segment at the site of the previous cesarean section scar. The lesion extends into the adjacent myometrium with indistinct margins. Multiple tiny internal echogenic foci are noted. Color Doppler demonstrates mild to moderate internal vascularity. The remainder of the myometrium is unremarkable without focal fibroids. The endometrium measures 9.5 mm in thickness and appears regular. No pelvic abscess or free fluid is identified.
Ultrasound showing uterine scar endometriosis
TVS pelvic ultrasound. A heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion is demonstrated within the previous cesarean section scar in the lower uterine segment, compatible with uterine scar endometriosis.
Report Line
A well-defined heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion measuring approximately 25 × 18 × 16 mm is identified within the anterior lower uterine segment at the site of the previous cesarean section scar. The lesion extends into the adjacent myometrium and demonstrates mild internal vascularity on Color Doppler with a few internal echogenic foci. A focal communication with the anterior endometrial lining through the cesarean scar defect is noted. No significant surrounding fluid collection is identified. Sonographic findings are highly suggestive of uterine cesarean scar endometriosis.
Impression
Sonographic features are consistent with uterine scar endometriosis involving the previous cesarean section scar. No evidence of pelvic abscess or associated adnexal inflammatory collection.
Recommendation
Correlation with the patient's history of previous cesarean section and cyclical pelvic pain is recommended. MRI pelvis may be performed to assess the depth of myometrial involvement and exclude associated adenomyosis if clinically indicated. Gynecological consultation is advised. Surgical excision with histopathological examination remains the definitive treatment.
Key Learning Points
  • Uterine scar endometriosis is a rare form of cesarean scar endometriosis involving the myometrium of the lower uterine segment.
  • Patients typically present with cyclical pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and abnormal uterine bleeding.
  • Ultrasound commonly demonstrates a heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion within the cesarean scar with internal vascularity.
  • The differential diagnosis includes cesarean scar defect (isthmocele), scar hematoma, adenomyosis, fibroid, and cesarean scar pregnancy.
  • MRI provides superior assessment of lesion extent and myometrial infiltration.
  • Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice.
  • Histopathological examination confirms the diagnosis.

Reactive uterine enlargement associated with PID

๐Ÿ“„ SCRS

Bulky uterus
or
Reactive PID

Bulky uterus or Reactive PID ultrasound case study

USG
Bulky uterus or Reactive PID ultrasound case study
CASE–1
Clinical History
A 34-year-old female presented with lower abdominal pain, fever, abnormal vaginal discharge, and pelvic tenderness. She was referred for pelvic ultrasound to evaluate suspected pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). There was no history suggestive of uterine fibroids or adenomyosis.
Ultrasound Findings
Ultrasound examination demonstrates a mildly bulky anteverted uterus measuring approximately 12.7 × 5.9 × 5.0 cm (estimated uterine volume 197 mL). The myometrium appears mildly heterogeneous without any focal myometrial mass or fibroid. The endometrial thickness measures approximately 9.5 mm and appears regular. Mild diffuse reactive enlargement of the uterus is noted. Mild inflammatory changes are present within the pelvis, with a small amount of free fluid in the pouch of Douglas. No retained products of conception or intrauterine collection is identified. Both ovaries are visualized with preserved morphology and vascularity.
Ultrasound showing bulky uterus associated with PID
Transabdominal pelvic ultrasound. Mildly enlarged (bulky) uterus measuring approximately 12.7 × 5.9 × 5.0 cm with mildly heterogeneous myometrium. Endometrial thickness measures 9.5 mm. The findings are compatible with reactive uterine enlargement associated with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).
Report Line
Mild bulky uterus measuring approximately 12.7 × 5.9 × 5.0 cm (estimated uterine volume 197 mL) with mildly heterogeneous myometrial echotexture. Endometrial thickness measures 9.5 mm. No focal myometrial lesion is identified. Mild reactive inflammatory enlargement of the uterus is noted in association with pelvic inflammatory changes, consistent with PID-associated bulky uterus.
Impression
Reactive uterine enlargement associated with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).
Recommendation
Clinical correlation with symptoms, pelvic examination, and inflammatory markers is recommended. Appropriate antibiotic therapy should be considered according to institutional PID guidelines. Follow-up pelvic ultrasound after completion of treatment may be performed to document resolution of the reactive uterine enlargement and associated inflammatory changes.
Key Learning Points
  • A mildly bulky uterus is a non-specific ultrasound finding and may occur as a reactive change in PID.
  • Reactive uterine enlargement is characterized by diffuse mild uterine enlargement without a focal myometrial mass.
  • The myometrium may appear mildly heterogeneous due to inflammatory edema.
  • The endometrium may be normal or mildly thickened depending on associated endometritis.
  • Associated ultrasound findings of PID include pelvic free fluid, salpingitis, hydrosalpinx, pyosalpinx, tubo-ovarian complex, or tubo-ovarian abscess.
  • Color Doppler may demonstrate increased myometrial vascularity in active inflammation.
  • Correlation with clinical findings and laboratory investigations is essential, as ultrasound findings alone are not diagnostic of PID.

LSCS endometriosis

๐Ÿ“„ SCRS

LSCS
Endometriosis

Endometriosis ultrasound case study

USG
LSCS endometriosis ultrasound case study
CASE–1
Clinical History
A 32-year-old female presented with a painful swelling in the anterior lower abdominal wall over the previous lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) scar. The pain was cyclical, increasing during menstruation. The patient was referred for ultrasound evaluation to assess the palpable scar lesion.
Ultrasound Findings
Ultrasound examination demonstrates a well-defined irregular heterogeneously hypoechoic solid lesion within the anterior abdominal wall involving the subcutaneous tissue and rectus sheath at the site of the previous LSCS scar. ternal scattered echogenic foci and mild posterior acoustic attenuation are noted. Color Doppler demonstrates mild to moderate internal vascularity. Mild surrounding fibrotic changes are present. No liquefaction, abscess, or fascial defect is identified. No evidence of incisional hernia is seen.
Ultrasound showing LSCS scar endometriosis
Ultrasound of the anterior abdominal wall. A heterogeneously hypoechoic vascular soft tissue lesion is demonstrated within the previous LSCS scar, consistent with scar endometriosis.
Report Line
A well-defined heterogeneously hypoechoic soft tissue lesion is noted within the anterior abdominal wall at the site of the previous LSCS scar, measuring approximately 35 × 26 mm. The lesion demonstrates mild to moderate internal vascularity on Color Doppler with surrounding fibrotic changes. No cystic degeneration, abscess, or incisional hernia is identified. Sonographic findings are highly suggestive of abdominal wall (LSCS scar) endometriosis.
Impression
Features are consistent with abdominal wall endometriosis involving the previous LSCS scar. No sonographic evidence of abscess formation or associated incisional hernia.
Recommendation
Correlation with the history of cyclical pain and previous cesarean section is recommended. Surgical consultation for complete excision is advised. Histopathological examination following excision is recommended for definitive diagnosis. MRI may be considered for preoperative assessment if deep fascial or muscular involvement is suspected.
Key Learning Points
  • Scar endometriosis is a rare complication following cesarean section or other gynecological surgeries.
  • The typical clinical presentation is a painful palpable mass at the surgical scar with cyclical worsening during menstruation.
  • Ultrasound usually demonstrates a heterogeneously hypoechoic solid lesion with internal vascularity.
  • Differential diagnoses include suture granuloma, desmoid tumor, hematoma, abscess, incisional hernia, and soft tissue neoplasm.
  • MRI is useful for evaluating the extent of disease before surgery.
  • Complete surgical excision with clear margins is the treatment of choice and minimizes recurrence.
  • Histopathological examination remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis.

Acute appendicitis

๐Ÿ“„ SCRS

Acute appendicitis

Acute appendicitis ultrasound case study

USG
Acute appendicitis ultrasound case study
CASE–1
Clinical History
A 24-year-old patient presented with acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain, fever, nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite. On clinical examination, there was localized tenderness at McBurney's point with guarding. The patient was referred for abdominal ultrasound to evaluate suspected acute appendicitis.
Ultrasound Findings
Ultrasound examination demonstrates a blind-ending, non-compressible tubular structure arising from the cecum in the right iliac fossa measuring approximately 8.5 mm in maximal outer diameter. The appendiceal wall is thickened with preserved mural stratification. Increased periappendiceal echogenic fat is noted, consistent with surrounding inflammatory changes. Color Doppler demonstrates increased mural vascularity (hyperemia). A small amount of periappendiceal free fluid is present. No appendicolith, periappendiceal abscess, perforation, or phlegmon is identified.
Ultrasound showing acute appendicitis
Ultrasound of the right iliac fossa. A non-compressible blind-ending tubular structure measuring greater than 6 mm with periappendiceal inflammatory fat changes and increased Color Doppler vascularity is demonstrated, consistent with acute appendicitis.
Report Line
A blind-ending, non-compressible tubular structure arising from the cecum measures approximately 8.5 mm in maximal diameter with mural thickening and increased Color Doppler vascularity. Mild periappendiceal inflammatory fat changes and a small amount of adjacent free fluid are present. No appendicolith, periappendiceal abscess, perforation, or phlegmon is identified. Sonographic findings are consistent with acute uncomplicated appendicitis.
Impression
Features are consistent with acute uncomplicated appendicitis with associated mild periappendiceal inflammatory changes. No sonographic evidence of perforation or periappendiceal abscess.
Recommendation
Urgent surgical consultation is recommended. Correlation with clinical findings and laboratory investigations (CBC, CRP, and inflammatory markers) is advised. If ultrasound findings are equivocal or complications are suspected, contrast-enhanced CT abdomen and pelvis (or MRI in pregnancy) should be considered for further evaluation. Prompt surgical management should be guided by the treating surgeon.
Key Learning Points
  • The normal appendix measures ≤6 mm in maximal outer diameter and is compressible.
  • Acute appendicitis typically appears as a non-compressible blind-ending tubular structure measuring >6 mm.
  • Increased periappendiceal fat echogenicity and Color Doppler hyperemia are important secondary signs of inflammation.
  • An appendicolith appears as an echogenic focus with posterior acoustic shadowing and increases the risk of perforation.
  • Periappendiceal fluid, abscess, phlegmon, or loss of mural integrity suggests complicated appendicitis.
  • Ultrasound is the preferred first-line imaging modality in children, young adults, and pregnant patients.
  • CT abdomen has the highest diagnostic accuracy when ultrasound findings are inconclusive or complications are suspected.

Intestinal ascariasis

๐Ÿ“„ SCRS

Intestinal ascariasis

Intestinal ascariasis ultrasound case study

USG
Intestinal ascariasis ultrasound case study
CASE–1
Clinical History
A 28-year-old patient presented with intermittent colicky abdominal pain, abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting, poor appetite, and passage of worms in the stool. The patient was referred for abdominal ultrasound to evaluate suspected intestinal ascariasis and exclude bowel obstruction.
Ultrasound Findings
Ultrasound examination demonstrates multiple elongated linear echogenic tubular structures within the lumen of the small bowel, some showing a central longitudinal anechoic tube ("inner tube" or "railway track" sign), consistent with Ascaris lumbricoides. Mild fluid-filled bowel loops are present without significant bowel wall thickening. No evidence of bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, intussusception, free intraperitoneal fluid, or localized abscess is identified. No worms are visualized within the biliary tree on the current examination.
Ultrasound showing intestinal ascariasis
Ultrasound of the small bowel. Multiple elongated echogenic tubular structures with a central anechoic channel ("railway track" or "inner tube" sign) are visualized within the bowel lumen, consistent with intestinal ascariasis.
Report Line
Multiple elongated echogenic tubular structures with central longitudinal anechoic channels are demonstrated within the lumen of the small bowel, consistent with intestinal Ascaris lumbricoides infestation. No evidence of bowel obstruction, perforation, intussusception, free intraperitoneal fluid, or localized abscess is identified. No sonographic evidence of biliary ascariasis is seen on the current examination.
Impression
Features are consistent with intestinal ascariasis (Ascaris lumbricoides infestation) without sonographic evidence of bowel obstruction or other acute complications.
Recommendation
Clinical correlation and stool examination for ova and parasites are recommended. Appropriate antihelminthic therapy (e.g., albendazole or mebendazole) should be initiated as clinically indicated. Follow-up ultrasound may be considered if symptoms persist or if complications such as bowel obstruction or biliary migration are suspected.
Key Learning Points
  • Ascaris lumbricoides is the most common intestinal helminth affecting humans.
  • On ultrasound, intestinal worms appear as elongated echogenic tubular structures with a central anechoic tube ("inner tube" or "railway track" sign).
  • Multiple worms may produce the "bag of worms" appearance within dilated bowel loops.
  • Ultrasound is useful for detecting living worms and associated complications such as bowel obstruction, intussusception, or biliary ascariasis.
  • Stool microscopy remains the standard laboratory test for confirming intestinal ascariasis.
  • Albendazole or mebendazole are the first-line antihelminthic treatments.
  • Heavy worm infestation may lead to intestinal obstruction, volvulus, perforation, pancreatitis, or biliary obstruction requiring urgent management.

Colitis

๐Ÿ“„ SCRS

Colitis

Colitis ultrasound case study

USG
Colitis ultrasound case study
CASE–1
Clinical History
A 45-year-old patient presented with lower abdominal pain, diarrhea, fever, rectal urgency, and intermittent passage of blood-tinged stools. The patient was referred for abdominal ultrasound to evaluate suspected colonic inflammation and exclude other causes of acute abdomen.
Ultrasound Findings
Ultrasound examination demonstrates diffuse circumferential wall thickening involving the ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon with preserved mural stratification. The affected colonic segments demonstrate increased mural vascularity on Color Doppler (hyperemia). Mild surrounding pericolic fat stranding and a few reactive mesenteric lymph nodes are noted. Small-volume free intraperitoneal fluid is present within the pelvis. No focal colonic mass, bowel obstruction, abscess, perforation, or pneumoperitoneum is identified.
Ultrasound showing colitis
Ultrasound of the colon. Diffuse circumferential colonic wall thickening with preserved mural stratification, increased mural vascularity, and mild surrounding inflammatory fat changes. These sonographic findings are suggestive of colitis.
Report Line
Diffuse circumferential wall thickening involving multiple segments of the colon with preserved mural stratification and increased mural vascularity is demonstrated. Mild surrounding pericolic inflammatory fat changes, reactive mesenteric lymph nodes, and a small amount of pelvic free fluid are present. No evidence of bowel obstruction, perforation, abscess, pneumoperitoneum, or focal colonic mass is identified. Sonographic findings are suggestive of diffuse colitis.
Impression
Features are suggestive of diffuse colitis with associated mild pericolic inflammatory changes, reactive mesenteric lymphadenopathy, and minimal free intraperitoneal fluid.
Recommendation
Clinical correlation with laboratory investigations including CBC, CRP, ESR, stool routine examination, stool culture, and inflammatory markers is recommended. Gastroenterology consultation is advised. Colonoscopy with biopsy should be considered where clinically indicated to determine the underlying etiology. Contrast-enhanced CT abdomen may be performed if complications such as perforation, abscess formation, toxic megacolon, or ischemic colitis are suspected.
Key Learning Points
  • Colitis is characterized by inflammation of the colon due to infectious, inflammatory, ischemic, or other causes.
  • Ultrasound typically demonstrates circumferential colonic wall thickening (>4 mm) with preserved mural stratification and increased Color Doppler vascularity during active inflammation.
  • Mild pericolic fat inflammation, reactive mesenteric lymph nodes, and small-volume free fluid may accompany active colitis.
  • Ultrasound is useful as an initial imaging modality but cannot reliably distinguish infectious from inflammatory or ischemic colitis.
  • Colonoscopy with biopsy remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis of many forms of colitis.
  • Contrast-enhanced CT is indicated when severe disease or complications such as perforation, abscess, or toxic megacolon are suspected.
  • Persistent bloody diarrhea, severe abdominal pain, fever, or systemic toxicity requires urgent evaluation and management.

Diffuse peritonitis (generalized peritoneal inflammation)

๐Ÿ“„ SCRS

Diffuse peritonitis

Diffuse peritonitis ultrasound case study

USG
Diffuse peritonitis ultrasound case study
CASE–1
Clinical History
A 52-year-old patient presented with severe diffuse abdominal pain, abdominal distension, fever, nausea, vomiting, and generalized abdominal tenderness with guarding. The patient was referred for abdominal ultrasound to evaluate suspected generalized peritoneal inflammation and exclude intra-abdominal collections or bowel perforation.
Ultrasound Findings
Ultrasound examination demonstrates diffuse thickening and increased echogenicity of the peritoneal lining throughout the abdomen with generalized inflammatory changes involving the mesenteric fat. Mild diffuse free intraperitoneal fluid is present between bowel loops and within the pelvis. Multiple bowel loops demonstrate mild reactive wall thickening with preserved mural stratification. No localized abscess, bowel obstruction, or definite pneumoperitoneum is identified on the current examination. Color Doppler demonstrates increased vascularity of the inflamed peritoneum and adjacent mesentery.
Ultrasound showing diffuse peritonitis
Ultrasound of the abdomen. Diffuse thickening and increased echogenicity of the peritoneal lining with generalized mesenteric inflammatory changes and small-volume free intraperitoneal fluid. These sonographic findings are suggestive of diffuse peritonitis (generalized peritoneal inflammation).
Report Line
Diffuse thickening and increased echogenicity of the peritoneal lining are demonstrated throughout the abdomen with generalized inflammatory changes involving the mesenteric fat. Moderate free intraperitoneal fluid is noted between bowel loops and within the pelvis. Mild reactive bowel wall thickening is present without evidence of localized abscess, bowel obstruction, or definite pneumoperitoneum on the current examination. Sonographic findings are suggestive of diffuse peritonitis.
Impression
Features are suggestive of diffuse peritonitis (generalized peritoneal inflammation) with associated mild free intraperitoneal fluid and diffuse mesenteric inflammatory changes. No localized intra-abdominal abscess is identified on the current examination.
Recommendation
Urgent clinical and surgical evaluation is recommended. Correlation with laboratory investigations including CBC, CRP, ESR, serum lactate, blood cultures, and renal function tests is advised. Contrast-enhanced CT abdomen and pelvis should be performed to determine the underlying cause and evaluate for bowel perforation, ischemia, abscess, or other intra-abdominal pathology. Prompt treatment should be initiated based on the clinical diagnosis.
Key Learning Points
  • Diffuse peritonitis represents generalized inflammation of the peritoneal cavity and is a potentially life-threatening condition.
  • Ultrasound may demonstrate diffuse peritoneal thickening, increased echogenicity of the mesenteric fat, free intraperitoneal fluid, and reactive bowel wall thickening.
  • Color Doppler often shows increased vascularity of the inflamed peritoneum and adjacent mesentery.
  • Common causes include bowel perforation, severe intra-abdominal infection, postoperative peritonitis, pancreatitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, tuberculosis, and peritoneal dialysis-related infection.
  • Ultrasound is useful for detecting free fluid and inflammatory changes but has limited sensitivity for identifying the exact source of peritonitis.
  • Contrast-enhanced CT is the imaging modality of choice for determining the underlying cause, disease extent, and associated complications.
  • Diffuse peritonitis requires urgent medical and often surgical management because delayed treatment is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

Diffuse uterine adenomyosis

๐Ÿ“„ SCRS Diffuse uterine adenomyosis Diffuse uterine a...

Popular post